Research foundations / 1 MIN READ

Summary

From the original Diamond Cut research. Some terminology, references and product information reflect the period in which it was written.

Table 2. Weightings for Holloway Cut Adviser

FactorScore Exc.Very Good GoodFair Poor
Brilliance 0 - 40 - 0.8 0.8 - 1.61.6 - 2.4 2.4 - 3.23.2 - 4.0
Fire0 - 2 0 - 0.40.4 - 0.8 0.8 - 1.21.2 - 1.6 1.6 - 2.0
Scintillation0 - 2 0 - 0.40.4 - 0.8 0.8 - 1.21.2 - 1.6 1.6 - 2.0
Spread0 - 2 0 - 0.40.4 - 0.8 0.8 - 1.21.2 - 1.6 1.6 - 2.0
Total Score0 - 10 0 - 22 - 4 4 - 66 – 8 8 - 10

The Table 2 shows the relative weightings allotted to each of the four factors. The uniqueness of this approach is it recognises the holistic or co-dependant nature of all of a diamonds proportions.
 
A summary example of total scores for diamonds with a table size of 56% is shown in the topographic chart (Fig. 17).

Illustration from the original Summary research
Figure 17.

CONTINUE READING

Table size